Ex Parte AGRAWAL et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-0133                                                       
          Application No. 08/459,570                                Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                      
               Appellants’ invention relates to a programmable optimized-            
          distribution logic allocator for a high-density complex                    
          programmable logic device (PLD).  An understanding of the                  
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,              
          which is reproduced as follows:                                            
               1.  A method for distributing product terms from a                    
          programmable array in a very high-density CPLD to logic in said            
          very high-density CPLD, said method comprising:                            
               coupling each product-term cluster in a plurality of                  
          product-term clusters to a different input line of a programmable          
          logic allocator;                                                           
               configuring said logic allocator so that each output line of          
          said logic allocator has programmable access to a first                    
          predetermined number of product-term clusters in said plurality            
          of product-term clusters;                                                  
               wherein said first predetermined number of product-term               
          clusters includes at least twenty product terms; and                       
               upon programmably connecting a product-term cluster to an             
          output line of said logic allocator, said connected product-term           
          cluster is disconnected from all remaining output lines of said            
          logic allocator.                                                           
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                              
          Ha et al. (Ha)                 5,136,188         Aug. 4, 1992              
          Agrawal et al. (Agrawal)       5,225,719         Jul. 6, 1993              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007