Appeal No. 2002-0374 Page 13
Application No. 08/599,227
examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness
of claim 1. Accordingly, the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) is reversed. As the other independent claims require
either redundant unmapped cache lines and/or accessing the
redundant cache line without displacing the data in the main array,
we find that the teachings of Supnik, Rastegar and Lucente do not
suggest the language of claims 2-13. In sum, the rejection of
claims 1-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007