•The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte Robert P. Meagley, Kevin P. O’Brien,
Tian-An Chen, Michael D. Goodner,
James Powers and Huey-Chiang Liou
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0367
Application No. 10/353,506
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judges; BARRY and LEVY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
A patent examiner finally rejected claims 17-20, 26, and 27. The appellant
appeals therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm.
B. FINDINGS OF FACT ("FOF")
INVENTION
1. The invention concerns semiconductor structures. (Spec., p. 1, ll. 2-3.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007