Ex Parte Truong et al - Page 11

              Appeal 2007-1650                                                                      
              Application 11/111,799                                                                
                                     CONCLUSION OF LAW                                              
                    Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that             
              the Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 20, 21, 23, 26-28, 30, and 33.           
              The rejection of those claims is affirmed.                                            






                                            DECISION                                                
                    The Examiner's rejection of claims 20, 21, 23, 26-28, 30, and 33 is             
              Affirmed.                                                                             
                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with              
              this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                        


















                                                11                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013