THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JANAK SINGH, GREGORY S. BISACCHI,
JOLLIE D. GODFREY, Jr., TOOMAS MITT, RICHARD H. MUELLER,
ROBERT ZAHLER and THOMAS P. KISSICK
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0865
Application 08/007,9501
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 6-22 and 25 (Paper 6, page 1, item 4 under
1 Application for patent filed January 25, 1993. According to
applicants, the application on appeal is a continuation-in-part of application
07/912,384, filed July 13, 1992. The real party in interest appears to be
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007