Appeal No. 95-0865
Application 08/08/007,950
with a Compound XIII (the one on the left side), which has the
formula:
27. A person having ordinary skill in the art would
immediately recognize that the formula of Compound XII, as set
out on page 16 of Hagberg I is erroneous in that a double bond is
missing between the 7- and 8-positions in the ring and a hydrogen
(H) is missing from the nitrogen (N) at the 9-position. See,
e.g., page 56, formula XII which shows the necessary double bond
between the 7- and 8-positions and an NH at the 9-position. See
- 14 -
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007