Appeal No. 95-0865
Application 08/08/007,950
in place of Hagberg I Compound XIII in the Method of Preparation
L or Example 10.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 6-13 and 25
over Hagberg I alone is reversed.
3. The examiner's rejection based on Bisacchi,
Slusarchyk, Searcey and Hagberg II
The examiner rejected claims 20-21 as being unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Bisacchi, Slusarchyk, Searcey and
Hagberg II. This rejection is reversed for the same reason that
the rejection of claims 6-19 and 22 over Bisacchi, Slusarchyk and
Searcey was reversed. The information contained in Hagberg II
does not overcome the deficiencies of the combination of
Bisacchi, Slusarchyk and Searcey.
4. The examiner's rejection based on Hagberg I,
Bisacchi, Slusarchyk and Hagberg II
The examiner rejected claims 14-22 as being unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Hagberg I, Bisacchi, Slusarchyk and
Hagberg II. This rejection is reversed for the same reason that
the rejection of claims 6-13 and 25 over Hagberg I alone was
reversed.
5. New grounds of rejection
- 21 -
Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007