Appeal No. 95-0865
Application 08/08/007,950
The examiner's rejections
6. The examiner made the following four rejections in
the final rejection (Paper 6).
7. Claims 6-19 and 22 were finally rejected (Paper 6,
page 2) as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over:
a. Bisacchi, U.S. Patent 5,064,961 (1991) or
Slusarchyk, European Patent Application
0 352 013 (published Jan. 24, 1990)
b. in view of Searcey, IMPROVED SYNTHESES OF
N-SUBSTITUTED NITROIMIDAZOLES, Synthetic
Communications, Vol. 19, pages 1309-15
(1989).
8. Claims 6-13 and 25 were finally rejected (Paper 6,
page 5) as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
Hagberg I, European Patent Application 0 055 239 (published
June 30, 1982). In the Examiner's Answer (Paper 9, page 6), the
examiner refers to claims 6-13 and 23-24 and does not mention
claim 25. Claims 23-24 were cancelled (Paper 5, page 2). Hence,
we will assume that the examiner intended in the Examiner's
Answer to maintain a rejection claims 6-13 and 25.
9. Claims 20-21 were finally rejected (Paper 6,
page 6) as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over:
- 6 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007