Ex parte ONG - Page 21




          Appeal No. 1997-2041                                                        
          Application No. 08/337,131                                                  

        which would be brought about if another order of steps were                   
        followed.                                                                     
             Consequently, it is the opinion of this panel that the                   
        cited references considered collectively clearly suggest doing                
        what the appellant in this case has done in claim 1.                          
             In summary, this panel of the Board has:                                 
             a)  Reversed the rejection of claims 1-5, 10 and 11 under                
        35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hosokawa (JP59-                 
        229872) in view of Chen or Wolf.                                              
              b) Reversed the rejection of claims 1-5, 10 and 11 under                
         35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hosokawa (JP59-                
         229874) in view of Chen or Wolf.                                             
              c) Introduced a new ground of rejection of claim 1                      
         pursuant to our authority under 37 CFR § 1.196(b)                            
              The decision of the examiner is reversed.                               
              This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant               
         to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
         rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203               
         Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                  
         37 CFR                                                                       
         § 1.196(b) provides that “[a] new ground of rejection shall                  
         not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                    
                                         21                                           





Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007