THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MIKKO LINDSTROM
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2986
Application No. 08/260,7841
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6, 11-16, and 20-23.
Claims 7-10 and 17-19 are objected to for depending on
rejected claims. We affirm-in-part.2
1Application for patent filed June 16, 1994.
2The Answer includes claim 10 among the rejected claims
and also among the objected to claims. The examiner's
communication (paper No. 20) dated October 16, 1998, explains
that the objected to status is the correct status.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007