Appeal No. 1998-1069 Application No. 08/259,575 is performed (Schwabe and Yamane), and a first LDD implant is not performed simultaneously in both the NMOS and PMOS regions (as in Schwabe, Ichikawa and Hsu). In regard to the references wherein no conditions for implants are provided, Appellant notes that it would be equally likely that an artisan would choose other conditions. Finally, Appellant argues that the cited art fails to teach the desirability of employing relatively high LDD implant energies to overcome problems associated with high channel current densities, and the necessity of forming well regions at high energies to allow LDD implants to be subsequently performed at high energies. It is the Examiner's position that the methods of 14 Schwabe, Bergonzoni, Hsu, Ichikawa and Yamane individually form CMOS devices, "but taken collectively would suggest to those of ordinary skill in the art that a CMOS device as disclosed by the claimed invention could be formed." Specifically, the Examiner finds that Schwabe discloses a method of making a semiconductor device that includes forming 14Examiner's Answer, page 5; Supplemental Examiner's Answer, page 4 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007