Appeal No. 2001-0651
Application 08/134,187
103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw and
Prinz; 4) claims 66, 72, 102 and 108 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw, Prinz and
Beinbrech; 5) claims 67 through 69 and 103 through 105 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of
Bradshaw and Prinz as applied above, and further in view of AAPA;
and 6) claims 70 and 106 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw, Prinz, AAPA and
Beinbrech.
However, the examiner’s rejection of claims 26, 56, 92 and
128 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in
view of Bradshaw and Fabbiani has not been sustained.
Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-
part.
22
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007