Appeal No. 1999-1098
Application 08/627,313
said fourth memory block is arranged so that another
shorter side of said fourth memory block is adjacent to
another longer side of said third memory block and another
longer side of said fourth memory block is located on an
extension of another shorter side of said third memory block.
In rejecting Appellants' claims, the Examiner relies on
Appellants' admitted prior art and the following references:
Seefeldt et al. (Seefeldt) 4,864,381 Sep. 5,
1989
Ichiguchi 5,222,042 Jun. 22,
1993
Koike 5,229,629 Jul. 20,
1993
Katto et al. (Katto) 5,416,347 May 16,
1995
Kusunoki et al. (Kusunoki) 5,512,766 Apr. 30,
1996
Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being obvious over the admitted prior art and Kusunoki and
Seefeldt. Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being obvious over the admitted prior art, Kusunoki,
Seefeldt and Ichiguchi.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being obvious over the admitted prior art, Kusunoki, Seefeldt
and Katto.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007