Interference No. 105,113 Ritzdorf's reliance on this annealing apparatus is misplaced because it is not described as having surrounding sides, as required to satisfy the "thermal anneal chamber" limitation of claim 73, on which claim 76 depends. Preliminary Motion 2 is therefore granted with respect to this claim as well as its dependent claim 77. In summary, Cheung Preliminary Motion 2 is granted with respect to Ritzdorf's claims 74-77 and denied with respect to claims 68-73. Accordingly, in a separate judgment paper being mailed herewith, judgment is being entered against Ritzdorf's claims 74-77 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lacking written description support in Ritzdorf's involved application. D. Cheung Preliminary Motion 1 Cheung Preliminary Motion 1 under 37 CFR § 1.633(f) attacks Ritzdorf's benefit of each of the following applications with respect to Count 1, which is Cheung's claim 12, of which Ritzdorf's claim 70 is a copy: - 28 -Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007