The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAI-HUNG PAN, MARTIN C. ROBERTS, GURTEJ S. SANDHU, WEIMIN LI, CHRISTOPHER W. HILL and VISHNU K. AGARWAL ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0323 Application No. 09/577,835 ____________ HEARD: APRIL 7, 2005 ____________ Before BARRETT, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 25-30, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to the passivation of sidewalls of a word line stack. An understanding of thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007