Ex Parte 5872952 et al - Page 45




              Appeal No. 2005-2512                                                                                         
              Reexamination Control No. 90/006,431                                                                         

              (b) Claims 1-6, 9, and 16-18 under § 103(a) for obviousness over Stark in view of                            
                     the                                                                                                   
              Arcadia Manual (excluding RailMill and the associated use of ChipViewer), Tiwary, or                         
              Deng;                                                                                                        
                     (c)  Claims 1-6, 9, and 16-18 under § 103(a) over Rusu in view of the Arcadia                         
              Manual  (excluding RailMill and the associated use of ChipViewer), Tiwary, or Deng;                          
              and                                                                                                          
                     (d)  Claims 10 and 11 under § 103(a) over either of Stark and Rusu considered in                      
              view of any of the Arcadia Manual (excluding RailMill and associated use of                                  
              ChipViewer), Tiwary, and Deng, and further considered in view of Noguchi.                                    




















                                                            45                                                             





Page:  Previous  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007