The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DEAN IRVIN, LEE SWEETAPPLE, and GREG GERTEN
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0277
Application No. 10/270,236
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided July 17, 20071:
__________
Before HUBERT C. LORIN, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 13-16 and
38.2 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (b) (2002).
1 The appeal has been taken on Brief. Appellants confirmed attendance at an oral
hearing scheduled for 9:00 a.m., June 6, 2007, but did not appear.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013