Appeal 2007-0694 Reexamination Control 90/006,433 Patent 5,428,933 take the position that the inner surfaces of the side members shown in Guarriello ’222 are ‘planar.’” (Appeal Br. at 46). Guarriello Figure 9 depicts an insulating block having two side walls and interior separators (290, 292) surrounding a cavity. The exterior and interior side walls are depicted as straight lines. As such, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand Guarriello’s insulating block to have substantially planar interior and exterior surfaces. Additionally, we note that Horobin ‘969 Fig. 1 and Horobin ‘382 Fig. 1 depict planar interior and exterior surfaces on their side walls (12, 14). ix. Patentee Contends that Guarriello Does Not Teach Projections and Recesses of Substantially the Same Shape Claims 25-28 require that the claimed projections and recesses be of “substantially the same shape.” Patentee contends that Guarriello’s ribs and channels are not all of the same shape. (Appeal Br. 48). Patentee states that Guarriello’s depicts an L shaped channel to allow for its bi-directionality. (Id.). We agree that Guarriello does not describe projections and recesses having substantially the same shape. The Horobin patents however, describe and depict square projections and recesses all of the same shape. Horobin ‘969 teaches that insulating blocks with square projections and recesses are stackable without the need for mortar and providing a lightweight, but rigid, structure. As discussed above, one of ordinary skill in the art desiring the versatility of Guarriello’s bi-directional blocks with the stackability and lightweight, but rigid, structure of Horobin would have been guided to form 40Page: Previous 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013