- 222 - Ritch Trust group). See United States v. Administration Co., 74 AFTR 2d 94-5252, 94-2 USTC par.50,479 (N.D. Ill. 1994). On April 4, 1994, the District Court issued an order to show cause why the Kanter-related entities should not be compelled to obey the four summonses. In connection with the instant cases, Gallenberger was served by respondent with a discovery subpoena to produce documents. On May 18, 1994, Gallenberger appeared at the deposition without the requested documents. At the deposition, Gallenberger stated that she did not have the records because of a 3-year retention policy. Even under Gallenberger's alleged records retention policy, however, documents of an individual or entity under audit were not destroyed until the audit was completed. On the following day, May 19, 1994, a hearing was held in the District Court on the Government's motion to enforce the administrative summonses. At the hearing, Weisgal, who was served as the named trustee of the BK Childrens Trust, admitted that, after he received the summons, some of the documents, including documents relating to the Kanters, had been turned over to Administration Co. and that some had been discarded as part of a 3-year record retention and discard policy. Gallenberger, who had been served with summonses as president of Administration Co., Principal Services, andPage: Previous 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011