Investment Research Associates - Page 163




                                       - 239 -                                         
         to pay Zeus and made the payments because Kanter used his                     
         influence with Ballard and Lisle, who in turn used their                      
         positions of authority at Prudential to influence Prudential in               
         using Frey as the developer in the conversion of Prudential                   
         properties into condominiums.  The payments were accumulated in               
         Zeus (or distributed as loans) until 1983.  In 1983, Zeus                     
         distributed the funds to IRA.  In 1984 IRA distributed the funds              
         to Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc., effectively distributing the funds             
         45 percent each to Ballard and Lisle and 10 percent to Kanter.                
         Frey paid Zeus $103,500 in 1984 and $128,763 in 1985 (totaling                
         $232,263).  Although the money was accumulated in Zeus until it               
         purchased the preferred stock in Windy City in 1986, IRA                      
         distributed $249,870 to the KWJ Co. partnership as "loans" from               
         1984 to 1989.                                                                 
              It is clear that the payments made by Frey to Zeus were for              
         services provided by Ballard, Lisle, and Kanter.                              
              The second agreement (between Frey and Holding Co.) applied              
         to "capital contribution, profits and losses and Developers'                  
         Fees" for all condominium conversions excluding the developers'               
         fees from Prudential projects that were covered by the agreement              
         with Zeus.  The agreement could be terminated by either party                 
         with 45 days' prior notice with the termination effective only                
         with respect to new condominium conversions.  Although the second             
         agreement required Holding Co. to make capital contributions with             






Page:  Previous  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011