- 206 -
Substation Plot Plan Expenditure Requisition
Name
Year # ER Date Amount Equipment for
Transformers No. Approved which ITC
Claimed
Alva 1979 2 1772 1986/1987 $514,752 2d transformer
Babcock 1984 3 3643 1988 103,230 3d feeder
7228 1989/1990 558,171 4th feeder
Cedar 1980 – 4198 1988 664,050 138-kV
terminal line
Court 1980 3 4023 1988 226,500 5th & 6th
feeders
6035 1989 773,918 3d transformer
Crystal 1970 3 2422 1987 121,000 5th feeder
7867 1989/1990 952,345 3d transformer
Deltona 1983 3 4475 1990 733,616 2d transformer
Dumfoundling 1971 3 3091 1987/1988 78,591 4th feeder
Golden Gate 1982 3 5180 1988/1989 97,633 4th feeder
Hollybrook 1985 3 6029 1989 2,214,158 Construct
substation, 2
transformers,
3 feeders
Lakeview 1975 3 2459 1987 89,750 6th feeder
3740 1988/1989 92,000 7th feeder
Lewis 1972 3 2534 1987 83,150 4th feeder
4635 1988 83,327 5th feeder
6810 1989/1990 597,503 add
transformer
Lindgren 1970 4 2406 1987 94,138 9th feeder
136(...continued)
under each ER was within the original scope of that substation’s
plot plan. He testified that the installation of the equipment
in those ERs was with the original scope of the plot plans, and
that FPL was committed to install the number of
transformers/feeders as depicted on the original plot plan for
each substation.
Generally, the ERs explain that the expenditures for such
equipment were needed because of increased load growth.
Page: Previous 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011