Appeal No. 96-1426
Application 08/001,863
have completed appears to be the same. What we do not find is
appellants' partial data dependency interlocking step of using
"source-to-destination dependency interlock circuitry" to
eliminate N possible data dependency hazards and then determining
that all previous instructions have completed before dispatching
the instruction.
For the reasons discussed above, the rejection of claims 1,
3, 6, and 7 is reversed.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
RICHARD TORCZON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JAMES T. CARMICHAEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 12 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007