EWEN V. DOLLE et al. - Page 64




          Interference 103,482                                                        
                    4.   The concept of a number average sequence                     
               length as a means of identifying or characterizing                     
               the stereochemical characteristics of a polymer such                   
               as polypropylene is well know [sic] to me, as is the                   
               paper by Randall . . . which is referred to in the                     
               Winter Declaration . . . .  The concept of number                      
               average sequence length as a tool in characterizing                    
               stereochemical characteristics of a polymer is further                 
               addressed in substantial detail in the following book:                 
               Polymer Sequence Determination Carbon-13 NMR Method,                   
               James C. Randall, Academic Press, New York/San Francisco/              
               London, 1977. . . .                                                    
               While the Declaration of Carl Scott dated May 8, 1995                  
          (RE 1), Second Declaration of Jerry L. Atwood dated August 7,               
          1995 (RE 16), Declaration of William J. Gauthier dated                      
          September 28, 1998 (RE 16), and Second Declaration of William               
          J. Gauthier dated November 19, 1998 (RE 35), indicate that the              
          phrase “the sequence length is 3 to 50 monomer units”, which                
          Dolle employs to further define syndio-isoblock polymers                    
          having molecular chains in which syndiotactic and isotactic                 
          sequences are present, might be interpreted in a variety of                 
          ways inconsistent with the disclosure of Dolle Application                  
          08/147,006, we find the other interpretations of Drs. Scott,                
          Atwood, and Gauthier unreasonable in light of Dolle’s                       
          disclosure.                                                                 
               In light of Dolle’s supporting specification, persons                  
          skilled in the art would not have interpreted the phrase                    


                                         64                                           





Page:  Previous  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007