Interference 103,482
the basis of the Randall calculations” (RD 2), or otherwise
correspond to, are defined by, or are derived from Randall’s
formulas. Nevertheless, Ewen has not denied Winter’s
derivation declarations. Therefore, in the absence of any
evidence to the contrary, Winter’s declaration, consistent
with Buschermohle’s citation of Randall with respect to
corresponding formulas (DE 9, pp. 38-39), that Winter’s
equations (I) and (II) are derivations of Randall’s equations
(EE VI, p. 2089), are taken as fact. Moreover, as evidenced
by pages 38 and 39 of Buschermohle, Thesis Universitat
Hamburg, 1987 (DE 9), we find that Winter’s equations (I) and
(II), or derivatives thereof, were known in the art for use in
calculating the average syndiotactic and isotactic sequence
lengths of polyolefins.
Randall describes “[s]equence lengths of stereochemical
additions in vinyl polymers . . . in terms of the number
average lengths of like configurational placements” (EE VI, p.
2083, Synopsis, first sentence). Dr. Gauthier acknowledges
(Second Declaration of William J. Gauthier dated November 19,
1998,
pp. 2-3, para. 4 (Record of Junior Party Ewen, pp. 36-37
(RE 36-37); emphasis added):
63
Page: Previous 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007