The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board
___________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
___________
Appeal No. 2006-2217
Reexamination Control Nos. 90/006,789 and 90/007,420
Merged Reexamination Proceedings
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before BARRETT, LEE, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(b) from
the final rejection of claims 1, 6, 12, and 17. Amended claims 2
and 13 have been determined to be patentable, and the
patentability of claims 3-5, 7-11, 14-16, and 18-20 has been
confirmed.
We reverse, but enter new grounds of rejection as to
claims 1, 6, 12, and 17.
REEXAMINATION
A first "Request for Ex Parte Reexamination," Control
No. 90/006,789 ('6789 Reexam), was filed October 14, 2003, by
Third Party Requester James S. Hsue, for reexamination of
U.S. Patent 4,918,645 (the '645 patent), entitled "Computer Bus
Having Page Mode Memory Access," issued April 17, 1990, to
inventor Brian E.J. Lagoy, Jr., based on Application 07/098,449,
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007