Appeal No. 2006-2217
Reexamination Control Nos. 90/006,789 and 90/007,420
** Claims 6 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over "Multibus II," "82C08," "51C64H," "AP-97A," and
"iSBC MEM/3xx," further in view of Bruce.
* Whether there is motivation to combine the references is a
question of fact drawing on the factors of Graham v. John Deere
Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966). See McGinley
v. Franklin Sports, Inc., 262 F.3d 1339, 1351-52, 60 USPQ2d 1001,
1008 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Motivation ***
- 42 -
Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Last modified: November 3, 2007