Appeal 2006-1454 Application 09/004,524 Patent 5,483,421 B. The Prima Facie Case (1) Examiner’s First Theory of the Rejection Our Findings of Fact 81-85 set out the basis upon which the Examiner originally made a recapture rejection in the Final Office Action. As noted in Finding of Fact 86, the record supports the Examiner’s findings. Basically, in the application which matured into the patent now sought to be reissued, the Examiner rejected originally filed independent claims 1 and 7 over the prior art. Applicants proceeded to re-write application claim 1 by adding limitations. Amended application claim 1 issued as patent claim 1. Applicants also proceeded to re-write application claim 7 by adding limitations. Amended application claim 7 issued as patent claim 7. The Examiner made six points in Findings of Fact 83 and 84: (1) reissue claims 21-23 and 34 are broader than the original patent claims by the following two limitations: (1) the requirement that the material of the chip carrier is a “glass filled epoxy” has not been included in these claims; and (2) the requirement of “said chip carrier having a - 51 -Page: Previous 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013