THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte KEITH BALMER
Appeal No. 96-1014
Application 08/032,5301
ON BRIEF
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and HECKER, Administrative
Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
Application for patent filed March 15, 1993, entitled1
"Synchronized MIMD Multi-Processing System And Method Of
Operation," which is a continuation of Application 07/437,853,
filed November 17, 1989, now abandoned.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007