Appeal No. 96-1014
Application 08/032,530
processor or processors according to said stored
indication on an instruction by instruction basis.
The examiner relies on the following prior art patents:
Jaswa 4,733,353 March 22,
1988
Kametani 5,107,420 April 21,
1992
(filed August 13,
1987)
Claims 23-44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Kametani and Jaswa.
We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 20), the
Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 26) (pages referred to as
"EA__"), the [First] Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper
No. 28) (pages referred to as "SEA__"), and the [Second]
Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 28 on paper, but
No. 30 on file wrapper) (pages referred to as "2dSEA__") for
a statement of the examiner's position. We refer to the
Appeal Brief (Paper No. 25) (pages referred to as "Br__"),
the Reply Brief (Paper No. 27) (pages referred to as
"RBr__"), the Supplemental Reply Brief (Paper No. 29) (pages
referred to as "SRBr__"), and the Second Supplemental Reply
Brief (Paper No. 31) (pages referred to as "2dSRBr__") for a
statement of appellant's position.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007