THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HUMBERTO F. CASAL,
HEHCHING H. LI,
and DAVID MING-WHEI WU
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1365
Application No. 08/663,969
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 27, 28, 31-33, 35-37, 40-
42, and 44. We affirm.1
1A rejection not referred to in an examiner’s answer is
assumed to have been withdrawn. Ex parte Emm, 118 USPQ 180,
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007