Ex parte YAMANAKA et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-2256                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 08/686,477                                                  


          said count clock signal transmitted from a second external                  
          device and transmitting said count clock signal to said watch               
          dog timer means, and for halting a transmission of said count               
          clock signal transmitted from an external device to said watch              
          dog timer means under a condition that said DMAC uses said                  
          bus,” or “a count clock controller for supplying said count                 
          clock signal to said runaway detection circuit, receiving a                 
          bus permission signal from a CPU and halting the supplying of               
          said count clock signal to said runaway detection circuit when              
          said bus permission signal is received.”  Therefore, we                     
          reverse the rejection of claims 1, 2, 9, and 21 and of claim                
          3, which depends from claim 1.  We proceed to the second group              
          of claims.                                                                  




                             II. Claims 4, 5, 6, and 10                               
              The examiner asserts, “Mager explicitly teaches that                   
          binary counter 2900 (contained in watch dog timer 105) will be              
          reset upon receipt of a signal by OR gate 3025 on line 104                  
          indicating that a normal condition of a direct memory access                








Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007