THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SHIGERU KIKUDA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0511
Application 08/158,8371
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's rejection of claims 23-26, 32, 39-43, 50-52, and
53-60 under § 103. The rejection of claims 23, 25, 39-41 and
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007